Course design universities | Design of Evidence-Based Blended Learning

Active learning

The problem, discussion, strategy, application, and study tasks.

  1. Is there a formulated specific learning aim for the task?
  2. Is the importance of the learning aim clear?
  3. Are the study activities formulated and feasible?
  4. Is the correlation between activities and learning aim clear? Are the expected results of the study task clearly described, including the criteria for assessing results?
  5. Is it clear how the results will be discussed?
  6. Are the study tasks (depending on their place in the course):
    a.not too easy/simple or too difficult/complex?
    b.not too narrow or too broad?
    c.Is it .feasible in the available time?
    d.compatible with students’ self-development?
  7. Is there good coherence in the study task? The four parts (introduction, teaching aims, instructions, and follow-up discussion) must logically connect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *