Design of Evidence-Based Blended Learning in Higher Education

Monique Markoff, March 31, 2016

For good reason, blended learning is attracting much attention among educators and parents nationwide. This largely  untapped frontier may allow access to more and better quality content and prepare students for jobs in a techno-centric world (Bonk, Olson, Wisher & Orvis, 2002; Beetham & Sharpe, 2013). Not every school has the resources to invest in manipulatives, teacher training, or specialized learning software. However, blended learning can help students access both the materials and the instruction to enhance their conceptual understanding of mathematics.

Blended learning, the act of learning from computers for part of the school day, takes many forms and can serve various purposes. Some researchers propose that blended learning is just a short stop to complete online learning, a middle place where innovation can be developed to transition to virtual schools (Christensen, Horn & Slaker, 2013). More commonly, blended learning is seen as transitioning to better pedagogy (student-centred learning), increasing access and flexibility, and cost-effectiveness (Graham, Allen & Ure, 2003). Blended learning enables individualized learning paths, immediate feedback on problems, and the ability to go at the student’s pace. Although these are all factors that can enhance student learning, the true potential of blended learning is in its ability to optimize the resources – a methodology for truly blending the best resources available to teach a given subject. The best method may rest solely in the classroom, either through an online component or combination.

Equity is a severe issue. Blended learning’s efficacy as a mechanism to increase equity and access is found in its ability to diversify and optimize our lessons. Students in different schools and even in different classrooms are getting completely different experiences regarding curriculum, teaching quality and opportunities to engage with math conceptually (Oakes, 1986; Anyon, 1981). This disparity is the worst for students of colour, especially regarding their math outcomes (Lee, 2002). Blended learning can contribute to levelling the playing field in classrooms by providing exposure to rich tasks, complex instruction and an environment that can be responsive to students in both a timely and individualized manner. Blended learning can provide access to materials and teaching styles that match a student’s profile, thus differentiating to support that student best. These pieces of a blended learning environment can act as equity tools, giving students the experiences and instruction they need to reach their potential.

For educators interested in using blended learning approaches, this article provides ideas for implementation and some key questions that may guide stakeholders’ decision-making.

Click here for the article Mrs Markoff’s Blended Learning Advice for Teachers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.